Strengths and weaknesses of electronic referral: comparison of data content and clinical value of electronic and paper referrals in dermatology

Authors: Shaw, Lindsay J.¹; de Berker, David A.R.¹

Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 57, Number 536, March 2007 , pp. 223-224(2)

Article access options

Abstract:

One hundred and thirty-one electronic referrals and 129 paper referrals were reviewed and their content analysed. Four items of demographic data were better recorded in the electronic referrals. Three items of clinical data were significantly better recorded in the paper referrals. The mean global clinical score for clinical relevance was greater for paper referrals than electronic referrals. This study illustrates the strength of electronic referrals for communicating demographic data and their weakness when revealing what is wrong with the patient.

Keywords: ELECTRONIC REFERRAL; HOSPITAL REFERRALS; INFORMATICS

Document Type: Short communication

Affiliations: 1: Bristol Dermatology centre, Bristol

Export as:

The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.

If you are a Member of the RCGP, go to Online journal to access journal content.

Register for online access if you are a personal subscriber to the British Journal of General Practice and want to set up online access
Visit IngentaConnect to activate access to an institutional subscription
Find out how to subscribe

Sign in

Article Access Options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$31.15 plus tax Refund Policy

Online journal This month's full contents Free content Coming soon
Discussion forum Information for authors Advertising Contact BJGP